Why is AB 109 Bad for California?

AB 109 is the shifting of thousands of inmates from state prison to county jails. This is also known as “Prison Realignment”. The basic aim of AB 109 is to reduce state prison overcrowding. But since a year that it has been effective, there are questions being raised on the fact if it is fulfilling the basic aim it is intended for. Placer County law enforcement officials are raising concerns from escalating prison culture inside the county jail to the possibility of rising crime rates.

There are certain findings that have been presented by The Public Policy Institute of California on AB109. This institute researches California’s state and local relationships. They have revealed with their findings that AB 109 has been at the center of a controversy over state and local authorities due to its channeling of thousands of convicts to county jails rather than state prisons. Most county jails are already facing a serious problem of overcrowding before the would-be state inmates were transferred to them. Prior to realignment, 93% of the county jails were already operating at their full capacity. Since realignment went into effect, the increase in county jail population is not matched by decline in inmates in the state prison system.

The Placer County Jail has experienced a dramatic rise in prisoners since AB 109 was enacted. The daily population of the jail has gone from 523 inmates on any given day to the current level of 580. The jail has also experienced weeks and months where the average daily population was 600 prisoners. The jail facility is rated for a maximum of 480 inmates. The development of bringing experienced state prison inmates to the Placer County Jail has created a more dangerous county jail environment for both the prisoners and county correctional officers.

Also, AB 109 has seen no support from the state’s attorney district association and the police chief’s association. Police chief-ups and down the state continue to have concerns about the realignment’s short and long-term impacts. One factor around AB 109 influence local crime rates involves all of the state’s 58 counties having various methods and policies of tracking down “county prison inmates” that have been released, or are on alternative sentencing.

Thus, we have seen that AB 109 is bad for California. This is evident from the fact that criminals labeled non-violent under AB 109 classification system are still proving to be dangerous. For more info, http://www.bailall.com/blog/california-bail-bonds/ab-109-surety-bail-bonds

Some Good Reasons To Consider Becoming a Paralegal.

If you have been thinking about a legal career a job as a paralegal could be perfect for you.

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about the profession to help shed light on the most popular question i.e. what is a paralegal?

Hopefully they will shed more light on the profession for you:

Why is becoming a paralegal a good profession?

A career as a paralegal is a respectable profession.

Men and women alike can become paralegals. So it is a great alternative for those that like the law but don’t want to become lawyers.

How old do you have to be to become a paralegal?

The great thing is that there is no designated age to becoming a paralegal. Once you have completed the relevant training you are basically ready. All you need to do is apply.

Why do you have to train to become a paralegal?

Once you have the relevant certification, getting training will give you a further advantage when applying for positions. Your training will teach you how to research, document, interview and assist lawyers.

What is the job market like?

According to reports paralegal jobs are in high demand and openings are always available. The need for paralegals is driven by the fact that lawyers recognize their usefulness and importance.

Why is a Paralegal useful to a lawyer?

Simple put without a Paralegal a lawyer will have to carry out all the research and document themselves, which would give them less time to better serve clients.

What are the benefits of being a Paralegal?

You can expect steady work in a specialized profession within the legal department. There are also plenty of rewards. Top Paralegals can earn as much as $70,000 a year, when bonuses are factored in.

You can even expect to increase your earnings as you undergo more training and certifications.

It is also not uncommon for some legal departments to offer education reimbursements.

What career options are there for a paralegal?

Depending on what you are passionate about, it is possible to train specifically for your area of interest. This may be in immigration law, bankruptcy law, Patent law and more.

Where can I apply for a paralegal job?

The great thing is that you are not just stuck with working for a government legal department as there are a range of private law firms that have openings aswell.

How soon can I become a Paralegal?

Fortunately you can start your career as a paralegal today. Even if you have previously been in another profession or have been a stay at home mom.

For more information you can check out http://www.whatisaparalegalsite.com/

Notting Hill Solicitors, Selachii are #1

Expert legal advice from a knowledgeable tort lawyer should always be sought before signing any contract. A qualified legal advisor will review all the terms and conditions of the agreement to make sure that the client’s interests are protected, and will also explain the consequences of a possible breach of the contract.

If one or other of the signatories to a contract does not adhere to the terms to which he or she agreed, often referred to as the “fine print,” this is called breach of contract. Breaches can be of omission, in other words failing to perform an obligation under the agreement, or of commission, that is, taking an action that is forbidden by the contact’s terms or conditions.

In certain cases, involving less significant breaches, the parties are sometimes able to resolve the issue without the intervention of a court, for example through mediation, or in a direct conversation. In others, for example when the breach of contract has caused major financial losses or other significant damage, or when the aggrieved party particularly wants a binding court-ordered resolution, filing a lawsuit may prove to be the most appropriate course of action.

The court will award damages if it rules that the defendant did in fact violate the terms of the contract. This is true even if no actual losses have been suffered, however in such a case the amount of the damages will be low. Often the primary outcome sought be the plaintiff is an injunction against further breaches by the defendant.

If the other party’s breach of contract is especially significant, the ‘injured party’ can sometimes obtain immediate relief from the courts, which declare the agreement null and void. This releases the aggrieved party from his or her own obligations under the contract, but does not preclude filing a complaint and seeking damages, although these may not be easy to collect, even if awarded.

Based in Notting Hill, London, Selachii LLP is an energetic boutique law firm providing a wide range of legal services to its clients. Progressive and sometimes unconventional in its approach, Selachii goes the extra mile to ensure the client’s objectives are met.

Personal Injury Solicitors in London Launch New Website

Personal Injury Solicitors in London Launch New Website

It’s not often we blog news about a new legal website, but we tend to make exceptions when we see something that stands out from the crowd – which is what happened this month.  The Personal Injury Solicitors in London firm have just gone live with their new website and it deserves a mention.  Before we go any further though with our quick review, make sure you check the London Personal Injury Solicitor website out for yourself.

They are looking to attract new clients in the London area of the UK, and in order to do that, have really invested a lot of time in making sure that their website is up to scratch.  If you visit their website you will see that the homepage is dedicated to a general overview of what their personal injury solicitors can do, including links into the contact information so clients can get in touch to start off the compensation process.

Videos on the Website

One of the best things about the website is how they make great use of video.  Each section on the website has an associated YouTube video which has audio from one of the solicitors at the firm.  This gives some great peace of mind to people who are trying to decide which injury claims lawyer they should choose.  You can see a video that their social media team put together in order to promote the firm’s personal injury claims work.  You can watch that below via this embedded YouTube video:
 

Active Blog

In addition to the video content, there is also a blog which is actively updated every few weeks.  It includes insightful articles from the solicitors who work for the firm as well as the occasional guest.  Recent blog posts have included a post about the weirdest and strangest personal injury claims from the last couple of years as well as a very cool infographic showing some of the better ones.

No Obligation Consultation

Overall it’s one of the better legal websites we have seen on the web and deserves a mention.  If you are a person based in London, UK, who has been injured in an accident whether at work or due to someone else’s negligence then it’s worth checking these guys out.  They have a number of different ways of working including no win no fee.  Just get in touch with them and ask for a non-obligation consultation – you have nothing to lose, apart from a little bit of your own time.

Settlement: Banner Supply Agrees To Pay $54.4 Million In Chinese Drywall Class Action

Home > Settlements > Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action
Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action
June 15 2011
Miami, FL: A $54.4 Million settlement has been reached in a Chinese drywall lawsuit brought againt Banner Supply by homeowners in the Orlando area. The agreement covers 2,000 to 3,000 homes south of Orlando.
Some 7 million sheets of tainted drywall were imported from China between 2000 and 2009, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, most of which was supplied folllowing the devastating Hurricanes Rita and Katrina.
According to Builderonline “at least 95 companies have been implicated as distributors in lawsuits filed against Chinese manufacturers accused of being the source of tainted drywall. Banner Supply tops the list, while others on it include such ProSales 100 companies as L&W Supply, ProBuild, Stock Building Supply, and 84 Lumber. ”
While $54.5 million might seem a large settlement, it reportedly works out to between $18,000 and $24,000 for each of the 2,000 to 3,000 homes, however there are estimates which suggest the cost of repairing the affected homes could be as much as $100,000.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/banner-supply-agrees-to-pay-54-4-million-in-chinese.html?ref=rss

Settlement: $3.9m Breach Of Contract Lawsuit Settlement

Home Page >> Settlements >> $3.9M Breach of Contract Lawsuit Settlement
$3.9M Breach of Contract Lawsuit Settlement
Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim
Los Angeles, CA: A $3,907,000 settlement has been reached in an unfair business practices lawsuit brought against Wyndham, a time-share company.
The settlement, which involves a $3,192,000 award for fraud and a $715,000 for breach of contract, among other things, was brought against Wyndam by Casablanca Express. Over a 19 year period, Casablanca Express and Wyndham built a business relationship whereby Casablanca helped Wyndham market and sell its timeshare products. At Wyndham’s request, Casablanca worked http://chapter-7bankruptcysite.com almost exclusively for Wyndham. As part of the contract between the parties, Wyndham agreed to give Casablanca a “wind-down” severance agreement, whereby Wyndham would pay Casablanca for three years after terminating its relationship with Casablanca so as to allow Casablanca time to rebuild its business with other clients. Wyndham also promised to give Casablanca the right of first refusal on all travel certificates used by Wyndham.
In October 2008, claiming it needed help during the recession, Wyndham requested that Casablanca waive the wind-down clause in exchange for promises of a long-term, growing and exclusive business relationship going forward. At the time Wyndham asked for the deletion of the wind-down clause Wyndham had secretly decided to cease doing business with Casablanca. Shortly after Casablanca agreed to delete the wind-down provision of the agreement (and give up other financial entitlements) in exchange for the promise of a long-term, growing and exclusive business relationship going forward, Wyndham abruptly ceased doing business with Casablanca.
Loss of the value of the wind-down clause was valued at $6 million, and, lost profits on the breach of the right of first refusal provision of the contract in the amount of approximately $1 million.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/3-9m-breach-of-contract-lawsuit-settlement.html?ref=rss