Socallawsupport Best Southern California Attorney Directory
Socallawsupport.com the first and only Attorney Directory focused exclusively on Socal Attorneys just been completed and unveiled in Attorneys. The objective of the newest attorney directory is 2 fold first it allows consumers trying to find legal assistance to find an attorney conveniently located for their work or home. Second it provides attorneys an affordable supply of local experience of potential clients. Top features of the newest directory add a map, which displays the locations of attorneys in the area that this consumer is searching. The customer may then search by legal category to discover the sort of attorney they are looking for.
The best thing about Socallawsupport Attorney Directory is it was designed and belonging to a legal professional and an web site developer which were devoted to enhancing the customer experience. Their goal was making it highly functional, clean, responsive, and reasonably priced so that attorneys could get a web site. After over a year of development the ultimate product has achieved each their dreams and it is likely to be widely accepted by consumers and attorneys in Socal.
The normal clutter related to directory sites continues to be eliminated. You won’t be depressed by ads or gimmicks that are supposed to side track the consumer. Consumers is certain to get exactly what they are trying to find when they reach this website, a legal professional to help them making use of their legal situation. And attorneys can tell that local consumers searching for their professional services will discover them instead of sidetracked by annoying ads on the spot. An illustration of a legal professional featured listing is available here Law Offices of Kevin Cortright.
Socallawsupport has decided to ended up being the local resource for Socal consumers searching for a lawyer.
Settlement: Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Home Page >> Settlements >> Jury Awards $82.5M
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Harris County, TX: An $82.5 million settlement has been awarded to the estate of 27-year old Josua Wade Petrie, who was killed in a workplace accident. His estate had initiated a wrongful death suit.
On May 25, 2007, Mr. Petrie was working as a plant operator at a natural gas processing plant. A hot oil heater had stopped during the previous shift, and Petrie told http://theworkerscompensationdirectory.com/ the other operator on the shift that he was going to try to restart it.
The heater had four burners and pilot lights, which were fueled by gas from the plant. To start the heater, one operator manned a control panel, and a second operator – Petrie – manually opened valves to allow delivery of fuel gas through pipes to the pilot lights and burners.
Petrie and the other operator tried several times, without success, to light one of the burners. Petrie radioed the second operator at the control panel that he was going to try lighting another burner. The second operator began the programmed steps at the control panel and gave Petrie a thumbs-up. Unknown to the operators, gas had accumulated in the area of the burners, and when Petrie tried to light one of them, the heater exploded, killing Petrie. cortrightlaw.com/workers-compensation
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/jury-awards-82-5m-in-workplace-death-lawsuit-josua.html?ref=rss
Notting Hill Solicitors, Selachii are #1
Expert legal advice from a knowledgeable tort lawyer should always be sought before signing any contract. A qualified legal advisor will review all the terms and conditions of the agreement to make sure that the client’s interests are protected, and will also explain the consequences of a possible breach of the contract.
If one or other of the signatories to a contract does not adhere to the terms to which he or she agreed, often referred to as the “fine print,” this is called breach of contract. Breaches can be of omission, in other words failing to perform an obligation under the agreement, or of commission, that is, taking an action that is forbidden by the contact’s terms or conditions.
In certain cases, involving less significant breaches, the parties are sometimes able to resolve the issue without the intervention of a court, for example through mediation, or in a direct conversation. In others, for example when the breach of contract has caused major financial losses or other significant damage, or when the aggrieved party particularly wants a binding court-ordered resolution, filing a lawsuit may prove to be the most appropriate course of action.
The court will award damages if it rules that the defendant did in fact violate the terms of the contract. This is true even if no actual losses have been suffered, however in such a case the amount of the damages will be low. Often the primary outcome sought be the plaintiff is an injunction against further breaches by the defendant.
If the other party’s breach of contract is especially significant, the ‘injured party’ can sometimes obtain immediate relief from the courts, which declare the agreement null and void. This releases the aggrieved party from his or her own obligations under the contract, but does not preclude filing a complaint and seeking damages, although these may not be easy to collect, even if awarded.
Based in Notting Hill, London, Selachii LLP is an energetic boutique law firm providing a wide range of legal services to its clients. Progressive and sometimes unconventional in its approach, Selachii goes the extra mile to ensure the client’s objectives are met.
Personal Injury Solicitors in London Launch New Website
Personal Injury Solicitors in London Launch New Website
It’s not often we blog news about a new legal website, but we tend to make exceptions when we see something that stands out from the crowd – which is what happened this month. The Personal Injury Solicitors in London firm have just gone live with their new website and it deserves a mention. Before we go any further though with our quick review, make sure you check the London Personal Injury Solicitor website out for yourself.
They are looking to attract new clients in the London area of the UK, and in order to do that, have really invested a lot of time in making sure that their website is up to scratch. If you visit their website you will see that the homepage is dedicated to a general overview of what their personal injury solicitors can do, including links into the contact information so clients can get in touch to start off the compensation process.
Videos on the Website
One of the best things about the website is how they make great use of video. Each section on the website has an associated YouTube video which has audio from one of the solicitors at the firm. This gives some great peace of mind to people who are trying to decide which injury claims lawyer they should choose. You can see a video that their social media team put together in order to promote the firm’s personal injury claims work. You can watch that below via this embedded YouTube video:
Active Blog
In addition to the video content, there is also a blog which is actively updated every few weeks. It includes insightful articles from the solicitors who work for the firm as well as the occasional guest. Recent blog posts have included a post about the weirdest and strangest personal injury claims from the last couple of years as well as a very cool infographic showing some of the better ones.
No Obligation Consultation
Overall it’s one of the better legal websites we have seen on the web and deserves a mention. If you are a person based in London, UK, who has been injured in an accident whether at work or due to someone else’s negligence then it’s worth checking these guys out. They have a number of different ways of working including no win no fee. Just get in touch with them and ask for a non-obligation consultation – you have nothing to lose, apart from a little bit of your own time.
Settlement: Banner Supply Agrees To Pay $54.4 Million In Chinese Drywall Class Action
Home > Settlements > Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action
Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action
June 15 2011
Miami, FL: A $54.4 Million settlement has been reached in a Chinese drywall lawsuit brought againt Banner Supply by homeowners in the Orlando area. The agreement covers 2,000 to 3,000 homes south of Orlando.
Some 7 million sheets of tainted drywall were imported from China between 2000 and 2009, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, most of which was supplied folllowing the devastating Hurricanes Rita and Katrina.
According to Builderonline “at least 95 companies have been implicated as distributors in lawsuits filed against Chinese manufacturers accused of being the source of tainted drywall. Banner Supply tops the list, while others on it include such ProSales 100 companies as L&W Supply, ProBuild, Stock Building Supply, and 84 Lumber. ”
While $54.5 million might seem a large settlement, it reportedly works out to between $18,000 and $24,000 for each of the 2,000 to 3,000 homes, however there are estimates which suggest the cost of repairing the affected homes could be as much as $100,000.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/banner-supply-agrees-to-pay-54-4-million-in-chinese.html?ref=rss
Possible Case: Lemaitre Vascular Recalls Vascular Graft Due To Serious Adverse Events
Home > Investigations > LeMaitre Vascular Recalls Vascular Graft due to Serious Adverse Events
LeMaitre Vascular Recalls Vascular Graft due to Serious Adverse Events
July 24 2013
Washington, DC: The Food and Drug Administration has issued a Class 1 Recall of the LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. Albograft more information Vascular Graft due to blood leaking from the surface of the graft after implantation. This product may cause serious adverse health consequences, including death.
Within the U.S., this device was only distributed in Pennsylvania.
This device was manufactured in April 2011, and distributed from April 2011, through June 2013.
The Albograft Vascular Graft is made of synthetic material. It is designed to replace or repair a damaged artery with an abnormal enlargement (aneurysm) or a blockage (occlusion) caused by a disease.
On June 19 2013, the firm sent an Urgent Field Safety Notice dated June 19, 2013, to all affected customers. Affected models are: AMC1408, AMC1506, AMC1608, AMC1809, AMC1810, AMC2010, AMC4007, AMC4008, AMC6006, AMC6007, AMC6008, ATC1526, ATC1530, ATC3016, ATC3018, ATC3024, ATC3026, Batch 56890A
Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/lemaitre-vascular-inc-albograft-graft.html?ref=rss
Settlement: Skilled Healthcare Nursing Homes Class Action Settled For $62.8 Million
Home > Settlements > Skilled Healthcare Nursing Homes Class Action Settled for $62.8 Million
Skilled Healthcare Nursing Homes Class Action Settled for $62.8 Million
December 2 2010
Los Angeles,CA: A $62.8 million settlement has been approved by the Humboldt Superior Court in the class action lawsuit against Skilled Healthcare Nursing Homes. The suit alleged that the company filed to provide sufficient staffing levels for its patients at all 22 of its facilities.
Up to $26 million of the settlement is expected to go to individuals represented by the class action lawsuit. The lawyer representing the plaintiffs said his office has received about 4,000 claims since it distributed news of the settlement over one month ago.
As part of the settlement, Skilled Healthcare will pay $12.8 million to comply with an injuction that requires the company to maintain state-mandated staffing levels, which is 3.2 nursing hours per patient day. The injunction, which will be in effect for two years, allows a third-party monitor to inspect each facility involved in the lawsuit for compliance with staffing requirements. If the facilities maintain compliance for 18 months the injuction could be reduced.
Individuals represented by the class-action lawsuit have until January 5 2011 to file claims.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/skilled-healthcare-nursing-homes-class-action.html?ref=rss
Law Suit Filed: Class Action Filed Against Townsend Foods Over Hepatitis A Contaminated Mixed Berries
Home > Lawsuits > Class Action Filed Against Townsend Foods Over Hepatitis A Contaminated Mixed Berries
Class Action Filed Against Townsend Foods Over Hepatitis A Contaminated Mixed Berries
September 11 2013
Portland, OR: A food poisoning class action lawsuit has been filed against an Oregon-based fruit grower, alleging the plaintiff had to seek medical care after consuming a frozen berry mix tied to hepatitis A outbreaks in Colorado and other western states.
The lawsuit, filed by Suzanne Faber, alleges she sought a hepatitis A vaccination after consuming The Townsend Farms Organic Antioxidant Blend of berries she purchased from a Costco at 5050 N. Nevada Ave. in Colorado Springs. She does not specify whether she contracted hepatitis A. The mixed berries have since been removed from Costco stores.
The Townsend Farms Organic Antioxidant Blend was responsible for sickening 161 people in Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Hawaii, Washington, and California, according to a September 13 public health notice by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) .
The mixed berries ad pomegranate seeds were sold at Costco stores beginning in early 2013 and subsequently removed in May, when the CDC announced the finding of Hepatitis A contamination. Costco also issued a product recall and warned customers against consuming the berries.
Hepatitis A is a chronic liver disease that causes fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and a yellowing of the eyes and skin, among other symptoms. The disease is associated with foods tainted with fecal matter, and the illness can last from several weeks to several months. In some cases hepatitis A can be fatal.
According to the CDC, 70 consumers required hospitalization after contracting the disease. No deaths were reported.
Purely Pomegranate Inc, is also named as a defendant in the lawsuit, as the Hepatitis A contamination was linked to a shipment of pomegranate seeds Townsend Farms received from Purely Pomegranate, which had, in turn, been imported from a producer in Turkey.
The class seeks to represent anyone who ate the tainted berries and contracted hepatitis A or underwent testing or vaccination for the disease. People who came into close contact with sickened consumers are also eligible.
Food Poisoning Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/Townsend-Foods-Hepatitis-A-Contaminated-Mixed-Berries-Class-Action-Lawsuit.html?ref=rss
Settlement: $3.9m Breach Of Contract Lawsuit Settlement
Home Page >> Settlements >> $3.9M Breach of Contract Lawsuit Settlement
$3.9M Breach of Contract Lawsuit Settlement
Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim
Los Angeles, CA: A $3,907,000 settlement has been reached in an unfair business practices lawsuit brought against Wyndham, a time-share company.
The settlement, which involves a $3,192,000 award for fraud and a $715,000 for breach of contract, among other things, was brought against Wyndam by Casablanca Express. Over a 19 year period, Casablanca Express and Wyndham built a business relationship whereby Casablanca helped Wyndham market and sell its timeshare products. At Wyndham’s request, Casablanca worked http://chapter-7bankruptcysite.com almost exclusively for Wyndham. As part of the contract between the parties, Wyndham agreed to give Casablanca a “wind-down” severance agreement, whereby Wyndham would pay Casablanca for three years after terminating its relationship with Casablanca so as to allow Casablanca time to rebuild its business with other clients. Wyndham also promised to give Casablanca the right of first refusal on all travel certificates used by Wyndham.
In October 2008, claiming it needed help during the recession, Wyndham requested that Casablanca waive the wind-down clause in exchange for promises of a long-term, growing and exclusive business relationship going forward. At the time Wyndham asked for the deletion of the wind-down clause Wyndham had secretly decided to cease doing business with Casablanca. Shortly after Casablanca agreed to delete the wind-down provision of the agreement (and give up other financial entitlements) in exchange for the promise of a long-term, growing and exclusive business relationship going forward, Wyndham abruptly ceased doing business with Casablanca.
Loss of the value of the wind-down clause was valued at $6 million, and, lost profits on the breach of the right of first refusal provision of the contract in the amount of approximately $1 million.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/3-9m-breach-of-contract-lawsuit-settlement.html?ref=rss
I Am Seperating From My Spouse. At What Point Can I Drop Her…
Legal Question
Asked on: 10/15/13, 10:27 am
I am seperating from my spouse. At what point can I Employer Making Me Buy Something? drop her from my health insurance?
We have been married 3 years and I have been unfaithful during that time. Can she webpage file for adultry and what does that entitle her to? Will I be obligated to pay alimoney? She works and has always worked during the duration of our entilre relationship and marriage.
Share This On:
1 Answer
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawguru.com/legal-questions/maryland-family-divorce-custody-adoption/seperating-spouse-point-drop-health-571223408/
Settlement: Negligent Treatment Of Bedsores Results In $315k Verdict
What are you looking for?
Home Page >> Settlements >> Negligent Treatment of Bedsores Results in $315K Verdict
Negligent Treatment of Bedsores Results in $315K Verdict
Miami, FL: The family of an 88-year old woman who underwent treatment for a Stage IV sacral pressure sore which the family allege was negligently performed and led to their mother’s death, have been awarded $315 thousand in their medical negligence lawsuit.
The surgery was done through Vohra Health Services, a wound care company that treated residents at Miami Gardens Care Center. The woman’s daughter alleged in her lawsuit, that the doctor involved negligently performed a surgical debridement by failing to remove all the necrotic tissue from the wound. The daughter further alleged that the surgery and post-operative care from the nurse involved caused her mother’s death. Notably, the counsel for the defense counsel also blamed Miami Gardens for the worsening of the woman’s bed sore.
The jury found the physician 65 percent liable, the nurse 25 percent liable and Miami Gardens, as a Fabre defendant, 10 percent liable.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/medical-negligence-bedsore-treatment-miami-gardens.html?ref=rss
Possible Case: Defective Chrysler Jeep Fuel Tanks And Fires
Home Personal Injury Attorney > Investigations > Defective Chrysler Jeep Fuel Tanks and Fires
Defective Chrysler Jeep Fuel Tanks and Fires
June 13 2013
Detroit, MI: Findings from a two-year investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) show that that the fuel tanks on 1993 to 2004 Grand Cherokees and 2002 to 2007 Liberty SUVs are significantly more likely to leak and cause fires than those on comparable vehicles. The fuel tanks in these vehicle models are mounted behind the rear axle.
For 20 years there have been reports of some Jeep SUV models bursting into flames after being hit in the back. Further, at least 51 people have died as a result, reports indicate.
Early in June federal safety regulators asked Chrysler to issue a recall of some 2.7 million vehicles affected by the defect. Chrysler has refused to issue such a recall, and now has a deadline of June 18 to formally respond to the request for a recall.
“Our data shows that these vehicles may contain a defect that presents an unreasonable risk to safety,” David Strickland, NHTSA administrator, said in a statement. “NHTSA hopes that Chrysler will reconsider its position and take action to protect its customers and the driving public.”
Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/1993-to-2004-grand-cherokees-fuel-tank-fires-2002.html?ref=rss
