 |
Law-ref.org | THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES (1) |
Site search
Sister sites
tribunal [Global Index]
... Convinced that the permanent institution of a tribunal of arbitration, accessible to all, in the midst of the independent Powers, will contribute effectively to this result; ...
... The Permanent Court shall be competent for all arbitration cases, unless the parties agree to institute a special Tribunal. ...
... The Signatory Powers undertake to communicate to the International Bureau at The Hague a duly certified copy of any conditions of arbitration arrived at between them, and of any award concerning them delivered by special Tribunals. ...
... When the Signatory Powers desire to have recourse to the Permanent Court for the settlement of a difference that has arisen between them, the Arbitrators called upon to form the competent Tribunal to decide this difference, must be chosen from the general list of Members of the Court. ...
... Failing the direct agreement of the parties on the composition of the Arbitration Tribunal, the following course shall be pursued: ...
... The Tribunal being thus composed, the parties notify to the Bureau their determination to have recourse to the Court and the names of the Arbitrators. ...
... Except in cases of necessity, the place of session can only be altered by the Tribunal with the assent of the parties. ...
... The jurisdiction of the Permanent Court may, within the conditions laid down in the Regulations, be extended to disputes between non-Signatory Powers, or between Signatory Powers and non-Signatory Powers, if the parties are agreed on recourse to this Tribunal. ...
... Failing the constitution of the Tribunal by direct agreement between the parties, the following course shall be pursued: ...
... The Tribunal's place of session is selected by the parties. Failing this selection the Tribunal sits at The Hague. ...
... The Tribunal's place of session is selected by the parties. Failing this selection the Tribunal sits at The Hague. ...
... The place thus fixed cannot, except in case of necessity, be changed by the Tribunal without the assent of the parties. ...
... The parties have the right to appoint delegates or special agents to attend the Tribunal, for the purpose of serving as intermediaries between them and the Tribunal. ...
... The parties have the right to appoint delegates or special agents to attend the Tribunal, for the purpose of serving as intermediaries between them and the Tribunal. ...
... They are further authorized to retain, for the defence of their rights and interests before the Tribunal, counsel or advocates appointed by them for this purpose. ...
... The Tribunal decides on the choice of languages to be used by itself, and to be authorized for use before it. ...
... Preliminary examination consists in the communication by the respective agents to the members of the Tribunal and to the opposite party of all printed or written Acts and of all documents containing the arguments invoked in the case. This communication shall be made in the form and within the periods fixed by the Tribunal in accordance with Article 49. ...
... Preliminary examination consists in the communication by the respective agents to the members of the Tribunal and to the opposite party of all printed or written Acts and of all documents containing the arguments invoked in the case. This communication shall be made in the form and within the periods fixed by the Tribunal in accordance with Article 49. ...
... Discussion consists in the oral development before the Tribunal of the arguments of the parties. ...
... When the preliminary examination is concluded, the Tribunal has the right to refuse discussion of all fresh Acts or documents which one party may desire to submit to it without the consent of the other party. ...
... The Tribunal is free to take into consideration fresh Acts or documents to which its attention may be drawn by the agents or counsel of the parties. ...
... In this case, the Tribunal has the right to require the production of these Acts or documents, but is obliged to make them known to the opposite party. ...
... The Tribunal can, besides, require from the agents of the parties the production of all Acts, and can demand all necessary explanations. In case of refusal, the Tribunal takes note of it. ...
... The Tribunal can, besides, require from the agents of the parties the production of all Acts, and can demand all necessary explanations. In case of refusal, the Tribunal takes note of it. ...
... The agents and counsel of the parties are authorized to present orally to the Tribunal all the arguments they may think expedient in defence of their case. ...
... The decisions of the Tribunal on those points are final, and cannot form the subject of any subsequent discussion. ...
... The members of the Tribunal have the right to put questions to the agents and counsel of the parties, and to demand explanations from them on doubtful points. ...
... Neither the questions put nor the remarks made by members of the Tribunal during the discussions can be regarded as an expression of opinion by the Tribunal in general, or by its members in particular. ...
... Neither the questions put nor the remarks made by members of the Tribunal during the discussions can be regarded as an expression of opinion by the Tribunal in general, or by its members in particular. ...
... The Tribunal is authorized to declare its competence in interpreting the 'Compromis' as well as the other Treaties which may be invoked in the case, and in applying the principles of international law. ...
... The Tribunal has the right to issue Rules of Procedure for the conduct of the case, to decide the forms and periods within which each party must conclude its arguments, and to arrange all the formalities required for dealing with the evidence. ...
... The Award, given by a majority of votes, is accompanied by a statement of reasons. It is drawn up in writing and signed by each member of the Tribunal. ...
... The Award is read out at a public meeting of the Tribunal, the agents and counsel of the parties being present, or duly summoned to attend. ...
... In this case, and unless there be an agreement to the contrary, the demand must be addressed to the Tribunal which pronounced the Award. It can only be made on the ground of the discovery of some new fact calculated to exercise a decisive influence on the Award, and which, at the time the discussion was closed, was unknown to the Tribunal and to the party demanding the revision. ...
... In this case, and unless there be an agreement to the contrary, the demand must be addressed to the Tribunal which pronounced the Award. It can only be made on the ground of the discovery of some new fact calculated to exercise a decisive influence on the Award, and which, at the time the discussion was closed, was unknown to the Tribunal and to the party demanding the revision. ...
... Proceedings for revision can only be instituted by a decision of the Tribunal expressly recording the existence of the new fact, recognizing in it the character described in the foregoing paragraph, and declaring the demand admissible on this ground. ...