... 9. The
assessment of the
operation of the four main
legal instruments governing chemicals in the
Community, i.e.
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous substances(3),
Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to
restrictions on the marketing and use of certain
dangerous substances and
preparations(4), Directive 1999/45/EC of the
European Parliament and of the
Council of 31 May 1999
concerning the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous preparations(5) and
Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the
evaluation and
control of the
risks of
existing substances(6),
identified a
number of
problems in the
functioning of
Community legislation on
chemicals, resulting in disparities between the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions in
Member States directly
affecting the
functioning of the
internal market in this
field, and the need to do more to
protect public health and the
environment in
accordance with the
precautionary principle. ...
... 47. In
accordance with Directive 86/609/EEC, it is necessary to replace, reduce or refine
testing on
vertebrate animals.
Implementation of this
Regulation should be based on the use of alternative
test methods, suitable for the
assessment of
health and
environmental hazards of
chemicals, wherever possible. The use of
animals should be avoided by
recourse to alternative
methods validated by the
Commission or
international bodies, or recognised by the
Commission or the
Agency as appropriate to
meet the
information requirements under this
Regulation. To this end, the
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, should
propose to
amend the
future Commission Regulation on
test methods or this
Regulation, where appropriate, to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing. The
Commission and the
Agency should ensure that
reduction of
animal testing is a key
consideration in the
development and
maintenance of
guidance for
stakeholders and in the
Agency's own
procedures. ...
ARTICLE-6: General obligation to register substances on their own or in preparations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 4. A submission for
registration shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
ARTICLE-7: Registration and notification of substances in articles [
go to this ARTICLE]
... A submission for
registration shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
... A submission for
registration shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
ARTICLE-8: Only representative of a non-Community manufacturer [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-9: Exemption from the general obligation to register for product and process orientated research and development (PPORD) [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-10: Information to be submitted for general registration purposes [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-11: Joint submission of data by multiple registrants [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 4. A submission for
registration shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
ARTICLE-13: General requirements for generation of information on intrinsic properties of substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 2. These
methods shall be regularly reviewed and improved with a
view to reducing
testing on
vertebrate animals and the
number of
animals involved. The
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, shall, as soon as possible, make a
proposal, if appropriate, to
amend the
Commission Regulation on
test methods adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(4), and the
Annexes of this
Regulation, if
relevant, so as to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing.
Amendments to that
Commission Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure specified in paragraph 3 and
amendments to the
Annexes of this
Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 131. ...
... 2. These
methods shall be regularly reviewed and improved with a
view to reducing
testing on
vertebrate animals and the
number of
animals involved. The
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, shall, as soon as possible, make a
proposal, if appropriate, to
amend the
Commission Regulation on
test methods adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(4), and the
Annexes of this
Regulation, if
relevant, so as to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing.
Amendments to that
Commission Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure specified in paragraph 3 and
amendments to the
Annexes of this
Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 131. ...
... 2. These
methods shall be regularly reviewed and improved with a
view to reducing
testing on
vertebrate animals and the
number of
animals involved. The
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, shall, as soon as possible, make a
proposal, if appropriate, to
amend the
Commission Regulation on
test methods adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(4), and the
Annexes of this
Regulation, if
relevant, so as to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing.
Amendments to that
Commission Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure specified in paragraph 3 and
amendments to the
Annexes of this
Regulation shall be
adopted in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 131. ...
ARTICLE-14: Chemical safety report and duty to apply and recommend risk reduction measures [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-17: Registration of on-site isolated intermediates [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-18: Registration of transported isolated intermediates [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-19: Joint submission of data on isolated intermediates by multiple registrants [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 3. A submission for
registration shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
... (d) any
request for further
information and deadline set in
accordance with the third subparagraph of paragraph 2. ...
ARTICLE-21: Manufacturing and import of substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. A
registrant may start or
continue the
manufacture or
import of a
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of registrations of
phase-in substances, such a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date or, if submitted within the two-
month period before the
relevant deadline of
Article 23, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
months from that deadline, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of an update of a
registration according to
Article 22 a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance, or the
production or
import of the
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the update
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). ...
... 1. A
registrant may start or
continue the
manufacture or
import of a
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of registrations of
phase-in substances, such a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date or, if submitted within the two-
month period before the
relevant deadline of
Article 23, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
months from that deadline, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of an update of a
registration according to
Article 22 a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance, or the
production or
import of the
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the update
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). ...
... 1. A
registrant may start or
continue the
manufacture or
import of a
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of registrations of
phase-in substances, such a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date or, if submitted within the two-
month period before the
relevant deadline of
Article 23, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
months from that deadline, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of an update of a
registration according to
Article 22 a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance, or the
production or
import of the
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the update
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). ...
... 1. A
registrant may start or
continue the
manufacture or
import of a
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of registrations of
phase-in substances, such a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance or
production or
import of an
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the submission
date or, if submitted within the two-
month period before the
relevant deadline of
Article 23, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
months from that deadline, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). In the
case of an update of a
registration according to
Article 22 a
registrant may
continue the
manufacture or
import of the
substance, or the
production or
import of the
article, if there is no indication to the
contrary from the
Agency in
accordance with
Article 20(2) within the three
weeks after the update
date, without
prejudice to
Article 27(8). ...
ARTICLE-22: Further duties of registrants [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 5. An update shall be accompanied by the
relevant part of the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
ARTICLE-23: Specific provisions for phase-in substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-25: Objectives and general rules [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-26: Duty to inquire prior to registration [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-27: Sharing of existing data in the case of registered substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-28: Duty to pre-register for phase-in substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-29: Substance Information Exchange Fora [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-30: Sharing of data involving tests [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 6. The
owner of the
study who has refused to provide either
proof of the
cost or the
study itself, as referred to in paragraph 3 or 4 of this
Article, shall be penalised in
accordance with
Article 126. ...
ARTICLE-31: Requirements for Safety Data Sheets [
go to this ARTICLE]
... (b) where a
substance is persistent, bioaccumulative and
toxic or very persistent and very bioaccumulative in
accordance with the
criteria set out in Annex XIII; or ...
ARTICLE-32: Duty to communicate information down the supply chain for substances on their own or in preparations for which a safety
data sheet is not required [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-33: Duty to communicate information on substances in articles [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-35: Access to information for workers [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-37: Downstream user chemical safety assessments and duty to identify, apply and recommend risk reduction measures [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 3. For
registered substances, the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user shall comply with the
obligations laid down in
Article 14 either before he next
supplies the
substance on its own or in a
preparation to the
downstream user making the
request referred to in paragraph 2 of this
Article, provided that the
request was made at least one
month before the
supply, or within one
month after the
request, whichever is the later. For
phase-in substances, the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user shall comply with this
request and with the
obligations laid down in
Article 14 before the
relevant deadline in
Article 23 has expired, provided that the
downstream user makes his
request at least 12
months before the deadline in
question. Where the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user, having assessed the use in
accordance with
Article 14, is
unable to
include it as an
identified use for
reasons of
protection of
human health or the
environment, he shall provide the
Agency and the
downstream user with the
reason(s) for that
decision in
writing without
delay and shall not
supply downstream user(s) with the
substance without
including these
reason(s) in the
information referred to under
Articles 31 or
32. The
manufacturer or
importer shall
include this use in section 3.7 of Annex VI in his update of the
registration in
accordance with
Article 22(1)(d). ...
... 3. For
registered substances, the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user shall comply with the
obligations laid down in
Article 14 either before he next
supplies the
substance on its own or in a
preparation to the
downstream user making the
request referred to in paragraph 2 of this
Article, provided that the
request was made at least one
month before the
supply, or within one
month after the
request, whichever is the later. For
phase-in substances, the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user shall comply with this
request and with the
obligations laid down in
Article 14 before the
relevant deadline in
Article 23 has expired, provided that the
downstream user makes his
request at least 12
months before the deadline in
question. Where the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user, having assessed the use in
accordance with
Article 14, is
unable to
include it as an
identified use for
reasons of
protection of
human health or the
environment, he shall provide the
Agency and the
downstream user with the
reason(s) for that
decision in
writing without
delay and shall not
supply downstream user(s) with the
substance without
including these
reason(s) in the
information referred to under
Articles 31 or
32. The
manufacturer or
importer shall
include this use in section 3.7 of Annex VI in his update of the
registration in
accordance with
Article 22(1)(d). ...
ARTICLE-38: Obligation for downstream users to report information [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-40: Examination of testing proposals [
go to this ARTICLE]
... (b) a
decision in
accordance with point (a), but modifying the
conditions under which the
test is to be carried out; ...
ARTICLE-41: Compliance check of registrations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-42: Check of information submitted and follow-up to dossier evaluation [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-43: Procedure and time periods for examination of testing proposals [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 3. In
cases where two or more
Member States have expressed an
interest in evaluating the same
substance and they cannot
agree who should be the
competent authority, the
competent authority for the
purposes of
Articles 46,
47 and
48 shall be
determined in
accordance with the following
procedure. The
Agency shall refer the matter to the
Member State Committee, in
order to
agree which
authority shall be the
competent authority, taking into
account the
Member State in which the
manufacturer(s) or
importer(s) is located, the respective proportions of total
Community gross domestic product, the
number of
substances already being evaluated by a
Member State and the
expertise available. If, within 60
days of the
referral, the
Member State Committee reaches
unanimous agreement, the
Member States concerned shall
adopt substances for
evaluation accordingly. If the
Member State Committee fails to reach a
unanimous agreement, the
Agency shall submit the conflicting
opinions to the
Commission, which shall
decide which
authority shall be the
competent authority, in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(3), and the
Member States concerned shall
adopt substances for
evaluation accordingly. ...
... 3. In
cases where two or more
Member States have expressed an
interest in evaluating the same
substance and they cannot
agree who should be the
competent authority, the
competent authority for the
purposes of
Articles 46,
47 and
48 shall be
determined in
accordance with the following
procedure. The
Agency shall refer the matter to the
Member State Committee, in
order to
agree which
authority shall be the
competent authority, taking into
account the
Member State in which the
manufacturer(s) or
importer(s) is located, the respective proportions of total
Community gross domestic product, the
number of
substances already being evaluated by a
Member State and the
expertise available. If, within 60
days of the
referral, the
Member State Committee reaches
unanimous agreement, the
Member States concerned shall
adopt substances for
evaluation accordingly. If the
Member State Committee fails to reach a
unanimous agreement, the
Agency shall submit the conflicting
opinions to the
Commission, which shall
decide which
authority shall be the
competent authority, in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(3), and the
Member States concerned shall
adopt substances for
evaluation accordingly. ...
ARTICLE-46: Requests for further information and check of information submitted [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-47: Coherence with other activities [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-50: Registrants' and downstream users' rights [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 4. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, further
information may be required in
accordance with
Article 46 in either or both of the following
cases: ...
ARTICLE-51: Adoption of decisions under dossier evaluation [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-52: Adoption of decisions under substance evaluation [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-57: Substances to be included in Annex XIV [
go to this ARTICLE]
... (e)
substances which are very persistent and very bioaccumulative in
accordance with the
criteria set out in Annex XIII of this
Regulation; ...
ARTICLE-58: Inclusion of substances in Annex XIV [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-59: Identification of substances referred to in Article 57 [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-60: Granting of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-61: Review of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of the
review shall be taken in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 64 applied
mutatis mutandis. ...
ARTICLE-62: Applications for authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 7. An
application for an authorisation shall be accompanied by the
fee required in
accordance with Title IX. ...
ARTICLE-63: Subsequent applications for authorisation [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-64: Procedure for authorisation decisions [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 6. The
Agency shall determine in
accordance with
Articles 118 and
119 which parts of its
opinions and parts of any attachments thereto should be made
publicly available on its website. ...
ARTICLE-65: Obligation of holders of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-68: Introducing new and amending current restrictions [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. When there is an unacceptable
risk to
human health or the
environment, arising from the
manufacture, use or placing on the
market of
substances, which needs to be addressed on a
Community-
wide basis, Annex XVII shall be amended in
accordance with the
procedure referred to in
Article 133(4) by adopting new
restrictions, or
amending current
restrictions in Annex XVII, for the
manufacture, use or placing on the
market of
substances on their own, in
preparations or in
articles, pursuant to the
procedure set out in
Articles 69 to
73. Any such
decision shall take into
account the
socio-economic impact of the
restriction,
including the
availability of alternatives. The first subparagraph shall not apply to the use of a
substance as an
on-site isolated intermediate. ...
ARTICLE-69: Preparation of a proposal [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-78: Powers of the Management Board [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-84: Appointment of the Executive Director [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-87: Rapporteurs of Committees and use of experts [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-89: Establishment of the Board of Appeal [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-92: Persons entitled to appeal, time-limits, fees and form [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-93: Examination and decisions on appeal [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-94: Actions before the Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-96: The budget of the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-97: Implementation of the budget of the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-111: Formats and software for submission of information to the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-113: Obligation to notify the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-114: Classification and labelling inventory [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-115: Harmonisation of classification and labelling Committee for Risk Assessment shall adopt an opinion on the proposal, giving
parties [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-119: Electronic public access [
go to this ARTICLE]
... (g) the
guidance on
safe use provided in
accordance with sections 4 and 5 of Annex VI; ...
ARTICLE-120: Cooperation with third countries and international organisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-131: Amendments to the Annexes [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-132: Implementing legislation [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-134: Preparation of establishment of the Agency [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-135: Transitional measures regarding notified substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-136: Transitional measures regarding existing substances [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-137: Transitional measures regarding restrictions [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. By 1 June 2010, the
Commission shall, if necessary, prepare a
draft amendment to Annex XVII in
accordance with either of the following: ...