Law-ref.org
REACH - Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals
Site search
Global links
homepage
documents
Sister sites
Chess-Ref
ZVON
RFC-Ref
InChI
REACH Online
Local links
Previous
Next
Frontpage
Contents
Keywords
Local
Global
A
-
B
-
C
-
D
-
E
-
F
-
G
-
H
-
I
-
J
-
K
-
L
-
M
-
N
-
O
-
P
-
Q
-
R
-
S
-
T
-
U
-
V
-
W
-
Y
-
Z
add
[
Global Index
]
PREAMBLE
[
go to this PREAMBLE
]
... 79. A total
ban
on a
substance
would mean that none of its uses could be authorised. It would therefore be pointless to allow the submission of
applications
for authorisation. In such
cases
the
substance
should be
removed
from the
list
of
substances
for which
applications
can be submitted and
added
to the
list
of
restricted
substances
. ...
... 80. The proper interaction between the
provisions
on authorisation and
restriction
should be ensured in
order
to preserve the
efficient
functioning
of the
internal market
and the
protection
of
human health
,
safety
and the
environment
.
Restrictions
that
exist
when the
substance
in
question
is
added
to the
list
of
substances
for which
applications
for authorisation can be submitted, should be maintained for that
substance
. The
Agency
should consider whether the
risk
from
substances
in
articles
is adequately controlled and, if it is not, prepare a
dossier
in
relation
to
introduction
of further
restrictions
for
substances
for which the use requires authorisation. ...
... 115.
Resources
should be focused on
substances
of the highest
concern
. A
substance
should therefore be
added
to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC if it
meets
the
criteria
for
classification
as
carcinogenic
,
mutagenic
or
toxic
for
reproduction
categories
1, 2 or 3, as a respiratory sensitiser, or in
respect
of other
effects
on a
case
-by-
case
basis.
Provision
should be made to enable
competent authorities
to submit
proposals
to the
Agency
. The
Agency
should give its
opinion
on the
proposal
while interested
parties
should have an
opportunity
to comment. The
Commission
should take a
decision
subsequently. ...
... 124. In particular,
power
should be conferred on the
Commission
to
amend
the
Annexes
in certain
cases
, to set
rules
on
test
methods
, to vary the percentage of dossiers selected for
compliance
checking and to modify the
criteria
for their
selection
, and to set the
criteria
defining what constitutes adequate justification that
testing
is technically not possible. Since these
measures
are of
general
scope
and are designed to
amend
non-essential elements of this
Regulation
or
supplement
this
Regulation
by
adding
new non-essential elements thereto, they should be
adopted
in
accordance
with the
regulatory
procedure
with
scrutiny
provided for in
Article
5a of
Decision
1999/468/EC. ...
ARTICLE-45
: Competent authority [
go to this ARTICLE
]
... 5. A
Member State
may notify the
Agency
at any
time
of a
substance
not on the
Community
rolling
action
plan
, whenever it is in
possession
of
information
which suggests that the
substance
is a
priority
for
evaluation
. The
Agency
shall
decide
whether to
add
this
substance
to the
Community
rolling
action
plan
on the basis of an
opinion
from the
Member State
Committee
. If the
substance
is
added
to the
Community
rolling
action
plan
, the proposing
Member State
, or another
Member State
who agrees, shall evaluate that
substance
. ...
... 5. A
Member State
may notify the
Agency
at any
time
of a
substance
not on the
Community
rolling
action
plan
, whenever it is in
possession
of
information
which suggests that the
substance
is a
priority
for
evaluation
. The
Agency
shall
decide
whether to
add
this
substance
to the
Community
rolling
action
plan
on the basis of an
opinion
from the
Member State
Committee
. If the
substance
is
added
to the
Community
rolling
action
plan
, the proposing
Member State
, or another
Member State
who agrees, shall evaluate that
substance
. ...
ARTICLE-115
: Harmonisation of classification and labelling Committee for Risk Assessment shall adopt an opinion on the proposal, giving parties [
go to this ARTICLE
]
... 1. Harmonised
classification
and
labelling
at
Community
level shall, from 1 June 2007, normally be
added
to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC for
classification
of a
substance
as
carcinogenic
,
mutagenic
or
toxic
for
reproduction
category
1, 2 or 3, or as a respiratory sensitiser. Harmonised
classification
and
labelling
for other
effects
may also be
added
to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC on a
case
-by-
case
basis if justification is provided demonstrating the need for
action
at
Community
level. To this end,
Member State
competent authorities
may submit
proposals
to the
Agency
for harmonised
classification
and
labelling
in
accordance
with Annex XV. ...
... 1. Harmonised
classification
and
labelling
at
Community
level shall, from 1 June 2007, normally be
added
to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC for
classification
of a
substance
as
carcinogenic
,
mutagenic
or
toxic
for
reproduction
category
1, 2 or 3, or as a respiratory sensitiser. Harmonised
classification
and
labelling
for other
effects
may also be
added
to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC on a
case
-by-
case
basis if justification is provided demonstrating the need for
action
at
Community
level. To this end,
Member State
competent authorities
may submit
proposals
to the
Agency
for harmonised
classification
and
labelling
in
accordance
with Annex XV. ...
A
-
B
-
C
-
D
-
E
-
F
-
G
-
H
-
I
-
J
-
K
-
L
-
M
-
N
-
O
-
P
-
Q
-
R
-
S
-
T
-
U
-
V
-
W
-
Y
-
Z