... 9. The
assessment of the
operation of the four main
legal instruments governing chemicals in the
Community, i.e.
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous substances(3),
Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to
restrictions on the marketing and use of certain
dangerous substances and
preparations(4), Directive 1999/45/EC of the
European Parliament and of the
Council of 31 May 1999
concerning the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous preparations(5) and
Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the
evaluation and
control of the
risks of
existing substances(6),
identified a
number of
problems in the
functioning of
Community legislation on
chemicals, resulting in disparities between the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions in
Member States directly
affecting the
functioning of the
internal market in this
field, and the need to do more to
protect public health and the
environment in
accordance with the
precautionary principle. ...
... 9. The
assessment of the
operation of the four main
legal instruments governing chemicals in the
Community, i.e.
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous substances(3),
Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to
restrictions on the marketing and use of certain
dangerous substances and
preparations(4), Directive 1999/45/EC of the
European Parliament and of the
Council of 31 May 1999
concerning the approximation of the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions of the
Member States relating to the
classification,
packaging and
labelling of
dangerous preparations(5) and
Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the
evaluation and
control of the
risks of
existing substances(6),
identified a
number of
problems in the
functioning of
Community legislation on
chemicals, resulting in disparities between the
laws,
regulations and
administrative provisions in
Member States directly
affecting the
functioning of the
internal market in this
field, and the need to do more to
protect public health and the
environment in
accordance with the
precautionary principle. ...
... 47. In
accordance with Directive 86/609/EEC, it is necessary to replace, reduce or refine
testing on
vertebrate animals.
Implementation of this
Regulation should be based on the use of alternative
test methods, suitable for the
assessment of
health and
environmental hazards of
chemicals, wherever possible. The use of
animals should be avoided by
recourse to alternative
methods validated by the
Commission or
international bodies, or recognised by the
Commission or the
Agency as appropriate to
meet the
information requirements under this
Regulation. To this end, the
Commission, following
consultation with
relevant stakeholders, should
propose to
amend the
future Commission Regulation on
test methods or this
Regulation, where appropriate, to replace, reduce or refine
animal testing. The
Commission and the
Agency should ensure that
reduction of
animal testing is a key
consideration in the
development and
maintenance of
guidance for
stakeholders and in the
Agency's own
procedures. ...
... 70.
Adverse effects on
human health and the
environment from
substances of very high
concern should be prevented through the
application of appropriate
risk management measures to ensure that any
risks from the uses of a
substance are adequately controlled, and with a
view to progressively substituting these
substances with a suitable safer
substance.
Risk management measures should be applied to ensure, when
substances are
manufactured, placed on the
market and used, that
exposure to these
substances including discharges,
emissions and losses, throughout the whole
life-cycle is below the
threshold level beyond which
adverse effects may occur. For any
substance for which authorisation has been
granted, and for any other
substance for which it is not possible to
establish a
safe level of
exposure,
measures should always be taken to minimise, as far as technically and practically possible,
exposure and
emissions with a
view to minimising the likelihood of
adverse effects.
Measures to ensure adequate
control should be
identified in any
Chemical Safety Report. These
measures should be applied and, where appropriate, recommended to other
actors down the
supply chain. ...
ARTICLE-10: Information to be submitted for general registration purposes [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-14: Chemical safety report and duty to apply and recommend risk reduction measures [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-22: Further duties of registrants [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-31: Requirements for Safety Data Sheets [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 9.
physical and
chemical properties; ...
ARTICLE-37: Downstream user chemical safety assessments and duty to identify, apply and recommend risk reduction measures [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 2. Any
downstream user shall have the
right to make a use, as a
minimum the brief
general description of use, known in
writing (on
paper or electronically) to the
manufacturer,
importer,
downstream user or
distributor who
supplies him with a
substance on its own or in a
preparation with the aim of making this an
identified use. In making a use known, he shall provide sufficient
information to allow the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user who has supplied the
substance, to prepare an
exposure scenario, or if appropriate a use and
exposure category, for his use in the
manufacturer,
importer or
downstream user's
chemical safety assessment.
Distributors shall pass on such
information to the next
actor or
distributor up the
supply chain.
Downstream users in
receipt of such
information may prepare an
exposure scenario for the
identified use(s), or pass the
information to the next
actor up the
supply chain. ...
ARTICLE-38: Obligation for downstream users to report information [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-41: Compliance check of registrations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-60: Granting of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
ARTICLE-61: Review of authorisations [
go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. Authorisations
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall be regarded as
valid until the
Commission decides to
amend or
withdraw the authorisation in the
context of a
review, provided that the holder of the authorisation submits a
review report at least 18
months before the
expiry of the
time-limited
review period. Rather than re-submitting all elements of the
original application for the current authorisation, the holder of an authorisation may submit only the
number of the current authorisation,
subject to the second, third and fourth subparagraphs. A holder of an authorisation
granted in
accordance with
Article 60 shall submit an update of the
analysis of alternatives referred to in
Article 62(4)(e),
including information about any
relevant research and
development activities by the
applicant, if appropriate, and any substitution
plan submitted under
Article 62(4)(f). If the update of the
analysis of alternatives shows that there is a suitable alternative available taking into
account the elements in
Article 60(5), he shall submit a substitution
plan,
including a timetable for proposed
actions by the
applicant. If the holder cannot demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall also submit an update of the
socio-economic analysis contained in the
original application. If he can now demonstrate that the
risk is adequately controlled, he shall submit an update of the
chemical safety report. If any other elements of the
original application have changed, he shall also submit updates of these element(s). When any updated
information is submitted in
accordance with this paragraph, any
decision to
amend o