 |
Law-ref.org | Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) |
Site search
Sister sites
identity [Global Index]
ARTICLE-16: Rights Conferred [go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. The
owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to
prevent all third parties not having the owner's consent from
using in the course of trade identical or similar signs for goods or
services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which
the trademark is registered where such use would result in a
likelihood of confusion. In case of the use of an identical sign for
identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be
presumed. The rights described above shall not prejudice any
existing prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of
Members making rights available on the basis of use. ...
... 1. The
owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to
prevent all third parties not having the owner's consent from
using in the course of trade identical or similar signs for goods or
services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which
the trademark is registered where such use would result in a
likelihood of confusion. In case of the use of an identical sign for
identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be
presumed. The rights described above shall not prejudice any
existing prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of
Members making rights available on the basis of use. ...
... 1. The
owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to
prevent all third parties not having the owner's consent from
using in the course of trade identical or similar signs for goods or
services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which
the trademark is registered where such use would result in a
likelihood of confusion. In case of the use of an identical sign for
identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be
presumed. The rights described above shall not prejudice any
existing prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of
Members making rights available on the basis of use. ...
... 1. The
owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to
prevent all third parties not having the owner's consent from
using in the course of trade identical or similar signs for goods or
services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which
the trademark is registered where such use would result in a
likelihood of confusion. In case of the use of an identical sign for
identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be
presumed. The rights described above shall not prejudice any
existing prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of
Members making rights available on the basis of use. ...
ARTICLE-24: International Negotiations; Exceptions [go to this ARTICLE]
... measures
adopted to implement this Section shall not prejudice eligibility for
or the validity of the registration of a trademark, or the right to
use a trademark, on the basis that such a trademark is identical
with, or similar to, a geographical indication. ...
... 6. Nothing
in this Section shall require a Member to apply its provisions in
respect of a geographical indication of any other Member with respect
to goods or services for which the relevant indication is identical
with the term customary in common language as the common name for
such goods or services in the territory of that Member. Nothing in
this Section shall require a Member to apply its provisions in
respect of a geographical indication of any other Member with respect
to products of the vine for which the relevant indication is
identical with the customary name of a grape variety existing in the
territory of that Member as of the date of entry into force of the
WTO Agreement. ...
... 6. Nothing
in this Section shall require a Member to apply its provisions in
respect of a geographical indication of any other Member with respect
to goods or services for which the relevant indication is identical
with the term customary in common language as the common name for
such goods or services in the territory of that Member. Nothing in
this Section shall require a Member to apply its provisions in
respect of a geographical indication of any other Member with respect
to products of the vine for which the relevant indication is
identical with the customary name of a grape variety existing in the
territory of that Member as of the date of entry into force of the
WTO Agreement. ...
ARTICLE-34: Process Patents: Burden of Proof [go to this ARTICLE]
... 1. For the
purposes of civil proceedings in respect of the infringement of the
rights of the owner referred to in paragraph 1(b) of Article 28,
if the subject matter of a patent is a process for obtaining a
product, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order
the defendant to prove that the process to obtain an identical
product is different from the patented process. Therefore, Members
shall provide, in at least one of the following circumstances, that
any identical product when produced without the consent of the patent
owner shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be deemed to
have been obtained by the patented process: ...
... 1. For the
purposes of civil proceedings in respect of the infringement of the
rights of the owner referred to in paragraph 1(b) of Article 28,
if the subject matter of a patent is a process for obtaining a
product, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order
the defendant to prove that the process to obtain an identical
product is different from the patented process. Therefore, Members
shall provide, in at least one of the following circumstances, that
any identical product when produced without the consent of the patent
owner shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be deemed to
have been obtained by the patented process: ...
... (b) if there is a substantial likelihood that the identical product
was made by the process and the owner of the patent has been unable
through reasonable efforts to determine the process actually used. ...
ARTICLE-47: Right of Information [go to this ARTICLE]
... Members
may provide that the judicial authorities shall have the authority,
unless this would be out of proportion to the seriousness of the
infringement, to order the infringer to inform the right holder of
the identity of third persons involved in the production and
distribution of the infringing goods or services and of their
channels of distribution.
...
... 1. The
Council for TRIPS shall review the implementation of this Agreement
after the expiration of the transitional period referred to in
paragraph 2 of Article 65. The Council shall, having
regard to the experience gained in its implementation, review it two
years after that date, and at identical intervals thereafter. The
Council may also undertake reviews in the light of any relevant new
developments which might warrant modification or amendment of this
Agreement.
...